This is batch editing or batch processing. Photographers can edit several image files at once in either PS or LR. Since LR has some of the most used edits available, it becomes a very good option for photographers with large volumes of images. So, you could quickly use up a whole lot of disk storage space.
So, in PS, you will have at least three large image files in order to have a non-destructive image editing workflow. Some printers can print from a TIFF, but a JPEG is probably the most commonly used file format. Finally, you save your finished work in a file format that can be used. Then, you work on the TIFF or PSD (Photoshop document), saving your changes to it. The original RAW file will be changed, unless you first save that image as a PSD or TIFF. With Photoshop, you are changing the image file. Of course, you also have the option of saving it as a specific file type. You’re creating a new catalog of program commands. You’re not duplicating an image, multiplying it over and over with each new edit. That may sound like it would take up a lot of computer space, but it doesn’t really. You can also continue adjusting from where you left off. You can go back to your original image file again and again and it will be just as it was when you loaded it to your computer. Thus, the hard drive space needed for storage is relatively small. This catalog holds the editing instruction for all of your LR images. That catalog is a set of program commands that get applied to the image file when you export it as whatever file type output you are using. When adjusting your image, the edits are stored in a catalog. What that means is that the original file is never actually changed in LR. Lightroom differs significantly from PS in that LR edits are accomplished through non-destructive editing. Sometimes, a photographer simply needs what Photoshop does. Well, those advanced editing tools are the main reason PS exists in the first place. With LR having such awesome file management and batch processing tools, some may wonder why they would need Photoshop at all. Lightroom also has an advanced batch editing feature called Sync that offers an alternative method of batch processing.Īdvanced functions are where Photoshop excels. Some photographers can shorten their work time by hours using Lightroom’s batch processing tools. It offers easy solutions to manage your process, from loading your camera image files onto your computer, to cataloging RAW and finished files, to exporting options and even printing.īatch processing is another thing that Lightroom does differently than Photoshop. While both programs can be used to edit images, Lightroom is a workflow solution, too. The Main Differencesįile management is one of the major differences between the two programs.
#PTGUI PRO VS REGULAR FULL#
Full of features designed to allow photographers and other artists to manipulate their images to bring out the full potential of their artwork. Adobe’s programs are so entrenched into the photographic world that photoshop has become a verb to some people.
Many articles are available to see what those advantages are.Īdobe is a leader in post-processing programs. There are advantages to shooting in the camera’s RAW image format. Images shot in RAW will require some sort of processing to be shared, seen, sold, or printed. In addition, many images displayed as fine art or sold to clients have had some custom work done to them before delivering files or printing.Īny SOOC image is most likely going to be in the JPEG file format. In other words, there is nothing inherently superior in presenting SOOC images as opposed to an image with improvements or corrections. Regardless of how careful a photographer is in setting up exposure and composition, there is often at least one little thing that could be changed. When taking photos, a person will tend to differentiate in their minds what images are snapshots as opposed to fine photography. Straight out of the camera (SOOC) images can often use at least a tweak. Why Use Photoshop or Lightroom in the First Place?
0 kommentar(er)
